On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 09:57:13AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>@@ -368,6 +392,12 @@ static struct mfd_cell axp20x_cells[] = {
> >> .resources = axp20x_pek_resources,
> >> }, {
> >> .name = "axp20x-regulator",
> >>+ }, {
> >>+ .name = "axp20x-usb-power-supply",
> >
> >Could we use either "vbus-power-supply" to match the AXP datasheets,
> >or "otg-power-supply" which is slightly more obvious to board owners?
>
> I do not like the vbus name, since it does not indicate which bus
> it is, OTOH you are right that is what it is called in the datasheet.
>
> As for using otg, I think that usb is better then.
>
> All in all I believe that the current usb name is best, but if others
> disagree I'm open to renaming this.
>
> So anyone else have an opinion on what would be a good name for the
> cell and the compatible ?
I usually prefer to use the name mentionned in the datasheet, but if
that doesn't make sense, feel free to use an alternative like this
one.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
