On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Le 04/05/2015 10:56, Ludovic Desroches a écrit : >> >> The way pins, groups and functions are tied is too constraining for some >> controllers. It concerns mainly the ones we don't care about groups and >> functions, each pin can be muxed to any functions. >> The goal of these two patches is too remove some of the constraints. >> >> I have added the prototype of a pin controller and device tree to show the >> way I want to use these changes. I couldn't test it on boards using generic >> pinconf so I am not sure that I don't break something... >> >> >> Ludovic Desroches (4): >> pinctrl: change function behavior for per pin muxing controllers >> pinctrl: introduce complex pin description > > Linus, > > Ludovic sent this series nearly one month ago. It was posted after a RFC > series on the same topic two months ago. As we don't see any comment on > neither of them we assume that it's okay to include them. It's a quite big patch and I need help reviewing it and thinking of some possible consequences. Stephen, can you give me a hand with this? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
