On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add a single resource to the test bus device to exercise the platform
> bus code a little more. This isn't strictly a devicetree test, but it is
> a corner case that the devicetree runs into. Until we've got platform
> device unittests, it can live here. It doesn't need to be an explicit
> text because the kernel will oops when it is wrong.
Isn't the unittest oops'ing a problem?
> Cc: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/of/unittest.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> index 18016341d5a9..0a27b38c3041 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
> @@ -753,6 +753,11 @@ static void __init of_unittest_match_node(void)
> }
> }
>
> +static struct resource test_bus_res = {
> + .start = 0xfffffff8,
> + .end = 0xfffffff9,
> + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +};
> static const struct platform_device_info test_bus_info = {
> .name = "unittest-bus",
> };
> @@ -795,6 +800,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_platform_populate(void)
> if (rc)
> return;
> test_bus->dev.of_node = np;
> + platform_device_add_resources(test_bus, &test_bus_res, 1);
A comment here as to the purpose of this would be useful.
Rob
>
> of_platform_populate(np, match, NULL, &test_bus->dev);
> for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> --
> 2.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
