On 06/04/2015 10:26 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
On 06/04/2015 09:28 AM, tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
The Arria10 SOC uses a completely different SDRAM controller from the
earlier CycloneV and ArriaV SoCs. This patch abstracts the SDRAM bits
for the CycloneV/ArriaV SoCs in preparation for the Arria10 support.
Signed-off-by: Thor Thayer <tthayer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: Make c5_data static.
---
drivers/edac/altera_edac.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
drivers/edac/altera_edac.h | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 206 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 drivers/edac/altera_edac.h
diff --git a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
index a9e7c69..a8350f6 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/altera_edac.c
What branch are you basing this patch on? I get the following error when
applied to both v4.1-rc6, linux-next, and linux-edac/linux-next.
Applying: edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
error: patch failed: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c:400
error: drivers/edac/altera_edac.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 edac, altera: Refactor EDAC for Altera CycloneV SoC.
Dinh
OK. I'll refactor and resend. I was using Altera's internal for-next branch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
