On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 05/28, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > + opp-supply = <&cpu_supply0>; > opp-supply isn't mentioned anywhere. Is that intentional? Is it > supposed to be cpu-supply still? It isn't clear to me from the I'm also a bit worried about the naming here - regulator supplies should always reflect the name of the supply in the hardware and it seems unlikely that this is one.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
