On Tue, 26 May 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > > Yes I agree. > > > > One possibility is that I could add a suspend function to EDAC that > > always fails with a helpful message like "Suspend with EDAC not > > supported." If someone wants to suspend, they'll have to take the > > EDAC out of the device tree so its probe will bomb out. I'm not > > sure how normal it is to have suspend functions in the kernel > > that always fail, though. > > "Interesting" solution, but better than config exclusion, I'd say. > > > > > + /* > > > > + * This code assumes that the bootloader has already > > > > + * properly configured the sdram controller: > > > > > > Which bootloaders can do that? > > > > Whatever bootloader is configuring the sdram controller for the > > board. > > Ok, so direct question: will mainline u-boot 2015.04 configure the > controller correctly? Should be in 2015.07 Alan Tull -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
