Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I would suggest adding a link to how future vendor specific extension
> docs might look like - maybe this is probably not the time to discuss
> this.. but anyways.. we could make some statement to the effect of "SoC
> vendor specfic extensions are documented as
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>,opp.txt and should
> clearly indicate that the extensions are permitted only under the
> operating-points-v2 compatible description."

Will this work ?:

If required, this can be extended for SoC vendor specfic bindings. Such bindings
should be documented as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>-opp.txt
and should have a compatible description like: "operating-points-v2-<vendor>".

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux