On 2015/5/25 21:48, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Monday, May 25, 2015 6:52 PM, Zhou Wang wrote:
>> On 2015/5/25 13:10, Jingoo Han wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 May 2015 14:21:39 +0800, Zhou Wang wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This patch tries to unify ARM32 and ARM64 PCIe in designware driver. Delete
>>>> function dw_pcie_setup, dw_pcie_scan_bus, dw_pcie_map_irq and struct hw_pci,
>>>> move related operations to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>>>
>>>> I am not very clear about I/O resource management:
>>>>> if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>>>> pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>>>> global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>>>> pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>>>> global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>>>> }
>>>> so just move steps in dw_pcie_setup to dw_pcie_host_init.
>>>>
>>>> I have compiled the driver with multi_v7_defconfig. However, I don't have
>>>> ARM32 PCIe related board to do test. It will be appreciated if someone could
>>>> help to test it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 128 +++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> index 2e9f84f..7bad9e5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>>>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> #include <linux/types.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/hardirq.h>
>>>
>>> +cc Kishon Vijay Abraham I, Richard Zhu, Lucas Stach
>>>
>>
>> Thanks to involve more related guys to this discussion :)
>>
>>> Please use <linux/hardirq.h> and insert it alphabetically.
>>>
>>> +#include <linux/hardirq.h>
>>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>>> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>> #include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>
>>
>> OK, will do in next version patch.
>>
>>>>
>>>> #include "pcie-designware.h"
>>>>
>>>> @@ -67,17 +68,10 @@
>>>> #define PCIE_ATU_FUNC(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 16)
>>>> #define PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET 0x91C
>>>>
>>>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci;
>>>> +static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops;
>>>>
>>>> static unsigned long global_io_offset;
>>>>
>>>> -static inline struct pcie_port *sys_to_pcie(struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>>>> -{
>>>> - BUG_ON(!sys->private_data);
>>>> -
>>>> - return sys->private_data;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val)
>>>> {
>>>> *val = readl(addr);
>>>> @@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq)
>>>> static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)
>>>> {
>>>> int irq, pos0, i;
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);
>>>> + struct pcie_port *pp = desc->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>>>
>>>> pos0 = bitmap_find_free_region(pp->msi_irq_in_use, MAX_MSI_IRQS,
>>>> order_base_2(no_irqs));
>>>> @@ -281,7 +275,7 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>> {
>>>> int irq, pos;
>>>> struct msi_msg msg;
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(pdev->bus->sysdata);
>>>> + struct pcie_port *pp = pdev->bus->sysdata;
>>>>
>>>> if (desc->msi_attrib.is_msix)
>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>> @@ -310,7 +304,7 @@ static void dw_msi_teardown_irq(struct msi_controller *chip, unsigned int irq)
>>>> {
>>>> struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>>>> struct msi_desc *msi = irq_data_get_msi(data);
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(msi->dev->bus->sysdata);
>>>> + struct pcie_port *pp = msi->dev->bus->sysdata;
>>>>
>>>> clear_irq_range(pp, irq, 1, data->hwirq);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -342,13 +336,15 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
>>>> .map = dw_pcie_msi_map,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> +int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> struct device_node *np = pp->dev->of_node;
>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(pp->dev);
>>>> struct of_pci_range range;
>>>> struct of_pci_range_parser parser;
>>>> + struct pci_bus *bus;
>>>> struct resource *cfg_res;
>>>> + LIST_HEAD(res);
>>>> u32 val, na, ns;
>>>> const __be32 *addrp;
>>>> int i, index, ret;
>>>> @@ -502,15 +498,49 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> val |= PORT_LOGIC_SPEED_CHANGE;
>>>> dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, 4, val);
>>>>
>>>> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
>>>> - dw_pcie_msi_chip.dev = pp->dev;
>>>> - dw_pci.msi_ctrl = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * FIXME: we should really be able to use
>>>> + * of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources on arm32 as well,
>>>> + * but the conversion needs some more testing
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>>> + pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>>> + global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>>> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->io,
>>>> + global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr);
>>>> + }
>>>> + pci_add_resource_offset(&res, &pp->mem,
>>>> + pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr);
>>>> + pci_add_resource(&res, &pp->busn);
>>>> +#else
>>>> + ret = of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources(np, 0, 0xff, &res, &pp->io_base);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> + bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops,
>>>> + pp, &res);
>>>> + if (!bus)
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>> + bus->msi = container_of(&pp->irq_domain, struct msi_controller, domain);
>>>> +#else
>>>> + bus->msi = &dw_pcie_msi_chip;
>>>> #endif
>>>>
>>>> - dw_pci.nr_controllers = 1;
>>>> - dw_pci.private_data = (void **)&pp;
>>>> + pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>>>> + if (pp->ops->scan_bus)
>>>> + pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>>>
>>>> - pci_common_init_dev(pp->dev, &dw_pci);
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>>>> + /* support old dtbs that incorrectly describe IRQs */
>>>> + pci_fixup_irqs(pci_common_swizzle, of_irq_parse_and_map_pci);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources(bus);
>>>> + pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>>>>
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -653,7 +683,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_valid_config(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>>> static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>>> int size, u32 *val)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>>>> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>>> int ret;
>>>>
>>>> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0) {
>>>> @@ -677,7 +707,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
>>>> static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>>>> int where, int size, u32 val)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(bus->sysdata);
>>>> + struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;
>>>> int ret;
>>>>
>>>> if (dw_pcie_valid_config(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn)) == 0)
>>>> @@ -701,64 +731,6 @@ static struct pci_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
>>>> .write = dw_pcie_wr_conf,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>>>> -{
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp;
>>>> -
>>>> - pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->io_size > 0) {
>>>> - sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->io_bus_addr;
>>>> - pci_ioremap_io(global_io_offset, pp->io_base);
>>>> - global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>>>> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>>>> - sys->io_offset);
>>>> - }
>>>> -
>>>> - sys->mem_offset = pp->mem.start - pp->mem_bus_addr;
>>>> - pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->mem, sys->mem_offset);
>>>> - pci_add_resource(&sys->resources, &pp->busn);
>>>> -
>>>> - return 1;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static struct pci_bus *dw_pcie_scan_bus(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>>>> -{
>>>> - struct pci_bus *bus;
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(sys);
>>>> -
>>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
>>>
>>> 'pp->root_bus_nr' is initialized as '-1' at some soc-specific drivers
>>> However, 'sys->busnr' is set as '0, 1, 2 ...' by pcibios_init_hw()
>>> in arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c. '0, 1, 2 ...' means the number of
>>> each host controller.
>>>
>>> So, without setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2, ...',
>>> it makes the problem.
>>>
>>
>> 'sys->busnr' is set as "0, busn_res.end + 1 ..." in pcibios_init_hw() I think:
>>
>> pcibios_init_hw()
>> for (nr = busnr = 0; nr < hw->nr_controllers; nr++)
>> sys->busnr = busnr;
>> ...
>> busnr = sys->bus->busn_res.end + 1;
>>
>> and it indicates root bus number of one pcie controller.
>> so in dw_pcie_scan_bus:
>> pp->root_bus_nr = sys->busnr;
>> bus = pci_create_root_bus(..., sys->busnr, ...);
>
> Oh, you're right. Sorry for my mistake.
>
>> we set root bus number as "0, busn_res.end + 1". But in pcie-designware,
>> nr_controllers is set as 1, so it only comes into the loop in
>> pcibios_init_hw() one time.
>
> Right, 'nr_controllers' is set as just '1', even though more than
> 2 controllers are used.
>
>>
>> so how about we set 0 as default value of pp->root_bus_nr, then use
>> pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, pp->root_bus_nr, &dw_pcie_ops, pp, &res);
>> to create root bus?
>
> I agree with your opinion. However, I still want to wait for other
> people's opinions. They will give good comments.
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Jingoo Han
>
Right, the more comments, the better the driver will be.
Thanks for your reviewing.
Best regards,
Zhou
>>
>>> Thus, we need to come up with the way to resolve this.
>>>
>>> 1. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by each soc-specific driver.
>>>
>>> e.g)
>>>
>>> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-exynos.c
>>> @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ static int __init exynos_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
>>> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
>>> pp->ops = &exynos_pcie_host_ops;
>>>
>>> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-imx6.c
>>> @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ static int __init imx6_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
>>> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
>>> pp->ops = &imx6_pcie_host_ops;
>>>
>>> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-keystone.c
>>> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int __init ks_add_pcie_port(struct keystone_pcie *ks_pcie,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
>>> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
>>> pp->ops = &keystone_pcie_host_ops;
>>>
>>> ./drivers/pci/host/pci-layerscape.c
>>> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int ls_add_pcie_port(struct ls_pcie *pcie)
>>> pp = &pcie->pp;
>>> pp->dev = pcie->dev;
>>> pp->dbi_base = pcie->dbi;
>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
>>> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
>>> pp->ops = &ls_pcie_host_ops;
>>>
>>> ./drivers/pci/host/pcie-spear13xx.c
>>> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int spear13xx_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp,
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - pp->root_bus_nr = -1;
>>> + pp->root_bus_nr++;
>>> pp->ops = &spear13xx_pcie_host_ops;
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. Setting 'pp->root_bus_nr' as '0, 1, 2 ..' by pcie-designware.c
>>>
>>> I believe that someone will give better idea. :-)
>>>
>>>> - bus = pci_create_root_bus(pp->dev, sys->busnr,
>>>> - &dw_pcie_ops, sys, &sys->resources);
>>>> - if (!bus)
>>>> - return NULL;
>>>> -
>>>> - pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
>>>> -
>>>> - if (bus && pp->ops->scan_bus)
>>>> - pp->ops->scan_bus(pp);
>>>> -
>>>> - return bus;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static int dw_pcie_map_irq(const struct pci_dev *dev, u8 slot, u8 pin)
>>>> -{
>>>> - struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(dev->bus->sysdata);
>>>> - int irq;
>>>> -
>>>> - irq = of_irq_parse_and_map_pci(dev, slot, pin);
>>>> - if (!irq)
>>>> - irq = pp->irq;
>>>> -
>>>> - return irq;
>>>> -}
>>>> -
>>>> -static struct hw_pci dw_pci = {
>>>> - .setup = dw_pcie_setup,
>>>> - .scan = dw_pcie_scan_bus,
>>>> - .map_irq = dw_pcie_map_irq,
>>>> -};
>>>
>>> Right, 'struct hw_pci' should not be used in order to unify ARM32 and
>>> ARM64. I have no objection to remove 'struct hw_pci' from 'pcie-designware.c'.
>>> Thank you for your patch.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jingoo Han
>>>
>>
>> Many thanks for your reviewing!
>> Zhou Wang
>>
>>>> -
>>>> void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>>>> {
>>>> u32 val;
>>>> --
>>>> 1.9.1
>
>
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
