On Fri 2015-05-22 13:02:15, Alan Tull wrote:
> Add binding doc for Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> v4: Add bindings doc
> ---
> .../arm/altera/socfpga-sdram-controller.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram-controller.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram-controller.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram-controller.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..77ca635
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/altera/socfpga-sdram-controller.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM Controller
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible : Should contain "altr,sdr-ctl" and "syscon".
> + syscon is required by the Altera SOCFPGA SDRAM EDAC.
> +- reg : Should contain 1 register range (address and length)
> +
> +Example:
> + sdr: sdr@ffc25000 {
> + compatible = "altr,sdr-ctl", "syscon";
Is the syscon binding good idea? Should the EDAC driver be fixed to
accept altr,sdr-ctl binding, instead?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
