Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/21/2015 12:49 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-05-15, 00:32, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Why not just mark it as a property of an OPP rather than a phandle? just
>> thinking that this might setup a precedence for future needs like
>> "shutdown OPP" or "Reboot OPP" or something different that some other
>> SoC might have..
> 
> AFAIU, a property should be present in the OPP if and only if any OPP
> can set it. But in this case, only one OPP from the entire list can
> set it. So, its more a property of the list rather than every OPP
> within it. And then there wouldn't be any need to code that would
> check bugs in dtbs where multiple OPPs have it set.
> 
True.. fair enough.

Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux