On 2015-05-19 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 19 May 2015 13:23:22 Stefan Agner wrote: >> On 2015-05-19 12:16, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: <snip> >> Not sure how we can deal with the EFM32 vs. IMX changes... Patches 08-10 >> has no dependencies on the clock changes which Thomas merged. They could >> go through whatever EFM32 is merged normally (last time Arnd directly >> merged from Uwe), and then Shawn could base the rest of the changes on >> that too? > > Do you have a dependency on patch 10 (the one for EFM32) in your later > patches? Unfortunately, there is a dependency on that patch: I change the default of UNCOMPRESS_INCLUDE to debug/uncompress.h for all ARM_SINGLE_ARMV7M platforms. Without that patch, it would default to mach/uncompress.h, which does not exist for MACH_MXC/SOC_VF610. > > If not, you can send the other ones to Shawn, so I pull them as > a branch, and then I apply that on top of the merges. I have also > merged two other ARMv7M platforms for 4.2 now (both in next/soc), > so we should do the same change for those as well, and I'd rather > apply a patch for that, than merge a branch that is based on > next/soc. I guess, in that case, you need to take the others too? (08/09?) -- Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
