Hi Arnd, Guenter,
yes, that is brilliant idea!!
I will try to do so , that solve the compatibility problem , so I
guess we can try this time :-)
On 19 May 2015 at 04:14, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 10:03:52PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Monday 18 May 2015 10:23:30 Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > >
>> > > integrate watchdog_init_pretimeout and watchdog_init_timeout will be a
>> > > little hard,
>> > > we may need to change this API to :
>> > >
>> > > watchdog_init_timeouts(struct watchdog_device *wdd, unsigned int timeout_parm,
>> > > unsigned int pretimeout_parm, struct device *dev)
>> > >
>> > > then we need to update all the watchdog drivers which use this API,
>> > > maybe we can do this in a individual patchset, after this pretimeout
>> > > patch is merged.
>> > >
>> > > Is that OK ? any thought?
>> > >
>> > That is what I would recommend.
>> >
>>
>> The API change is fine, but I don't think you need to change all drivers.
>>
>> Just add a small wrapper function in the header file doing the conversion:
>>
>> static inline int watchdog_init_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
>> unsigned int timeout_parm, struct device *dev)
>> {
>> return watchdog_init_timeouts(wdd, timeout_parm, ~0ul, dev);
>> }
>>
>> Then you can update the drivers that actually use the pretimeout to
>> use the new function at some point, and leave all other drivers calling
>> the wrapper function.
>>
> Excellent idea.
>
> Guenter
--
Best regards,
Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
