On 2015-05-15 12:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 9 May 2015, Stefan Agner wrote: >> - irq_chip_unmask_parent(data); >> + if (parent->chip->irq_enable) >> + parent->chip->irq_enable(parent); >> + else >> + parent->chip->irq_unmask(parent); > > Why are you not creating irq_chip_enable_parent() which would have > been the proper function anyway? > Will add that... Btw, have you had a chance to look at 1/12? I added a helper there too to allow make use of generic chip with IRQ domain hierarchy. In case you are fine with that general appraoch I will send an updated version of the patchset with the irq_chip_enable_parent helper soon. -- Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html