On 05/13, Dinh Nguyen wrote: > > > On 5/13/15 2:54 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 04/14, dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> The CIU(Card Interface Unit) get its clock from the sdmmc_clk_divided clock > >> which is used to clock the card. The sdmmc_clk_divided clock is the sdmmc_clk > >> passed through a fixed divider of 4. This patch adds the sdmmc_clk_divided > >> node and makes the sdmmc_clk it's parent. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > > > > Is this a fix of some sort? I'm confused why this was sent to the > > clk maintainers when it seems to be more appropriate to go > > through the arm-soc tree. > > > > Ok, sorry about that. I thought since it was clock nodes, it would > appropriate to CC clk maintainers. Sure, Cc is fine, but I believe the mail was sent "To" us so that led to my confusion. > > BTW, can I take patches from drivers/clk/socfpga/* through the arm-soc > tree or would that go through you guys? > Unless there's some sort of complicated dependency between the clk tree and the arm-soc tree I'd prefer any patches against drivers/clk/* go through the clk tree. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
