On 05/13/2015 12:05 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-05-15, 11:04, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> Just curious -> is'nt it better to just have min<->max range? binding >> as it stands right now is open to interpretation as to what will be >> attempted and in what sequence? with a valid min, target or max - >> is'nt it more power efficient always to go for a "min" than a target? >> >> Further, min<->max implies anywhere in that range and is more >> consistent with "regulator like" description. > > It came out after some discussions on the list, you may want to go > through that. > > https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2015-January/019844.html I see the thread saying that voltage-tolerance is a crappy idea -> I agree to that. What I dont see in the thread, and the point I raised here, why have nominal/typical voltage at all? min<->max should be sufficient, correct? If the device cannot function at min, then it should not be documented as part of valid range at all. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
