Re: [PATCH v8 4/9] mfd: Add binding document for NVIDIA Tegra XUSB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 04 May 2015, Andrew Bresticker wrote:

> Add a binding document for the XUSB host complex on NVIDIA Tegra124
> and later SoCs.  The XUSB host complex includes a mailbox for
> communication with the XUSB micro-controller and an xHCI host-controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes from v7:
>  - Move non-shared resources into child nodes.
> New for v7.
> ---
>  .../bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt          | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bc50110
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/nvidia,tegra124-xusb.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> +NVIDIA Tegra XUSB host copmlex
> +==============================
> +
> +The XUSB host complex on Tegra124 and later SoCs contains an xHCI host
> +controller and a mailbox for communication with the XUSB micro-controller.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +--------------------
> + - compatible: For Tegra124, must contain "nvidia,tegra124-xusb".
> +   Otherwise, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-xusb", "nvidia,tegra124-xusb"'
> +   where <chip> is tegra132.
> + - reg: Must contain the base and length of the XUSB FPCI registers.
> + - ranges: Bus address mapping for the XUSB block.  Can be empty since the
> +   mapping is 1:1.
> + - #address-cells: Must be 2.
> + - #size-cells: Must be 2.
> +
> +Example:
> +--------
> +	usb@0,70098000 {
> +		compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xusb";
> +		reg = <0x0 0x70098000 0x0 0x1000>;
> +		ranges;
> +
> +		#address-cells = <2>;
> +		#size-cells = <2>;
> +
> +		usb-host@0,70090000 {
> +			compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xhci";
> +			...
> +		};
> +
> +		mailbox {
> +			compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-xusb-mbox";
> +			...
> +		};

This doesn't appear to be a proper MFD.  I would have the USB and
Mailbox devices probe seperately and use a phandle to point the USB
device to its Mailbox.

usb@xyz {
	mboxes = <&xusb-mailbox, [chan]>;
};

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux