On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 09:46:21AM -0700, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
> Update socfpga_agilex.dtsi to track the actual hardware description
> provided in altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager.yaml.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi | 18 ++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> index 1235ba5a9865..708cb8e762b6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/intel/socfpga_agilex.dtsi
> @@ -602,8 +602,7 @@ sdr: sdr@f8011100 {
> };
>
> eccmgr {
> - compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager",
> - "altr,socfpga-a10-ecc-manager";
> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ecc-manager";
You are breaking the ABI here. Before this series, the driver required
altr,socfpga-a10-ecc-manager.
> altr,sysmgr-syscon = <&sysmgr>;
> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
> @@ -619,40 +618,35 @@ sdramedac {
> };
>
> ocram-ecc@ff8cc000 {
> - compatible = "altr,socfpga-s10-ocram-ecc",
> - "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";
> + compatible = "altr,socfpga-a10-ocram-ecc";
AIUI, nothing used altr,socfpga-s10-ocram-ecc, so this change is okay I
guess. Normally, we'd require both because there might be some
difference you find later on, but here you could just look at the parent
node compatible.
If it were me, I'd just add the compatible string in the schema and
avoid the .dts change. That would have been less work...
Rob
