Hi Wolfram, On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:49:53 +0100 Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Herve, > > > The related big picture has been already presented in > > - the 'Add support for GE SUNH hot-pluggable connector' series [0] > > - the 'Runtime hotplug on non-discoverable busses with device tree > > overlays' talk at Linux Plumbers Conference 2024 [1]. > > Any outcome of the Plumbers meetup? Was this "double-link" solution > agreed on or so? The i2c-parent was proposed by Rob [0]. The need for the double link is what you, Hervé and I had agreed during our discussion after LPC, based on having realized that the forward link is insufficient for some cases (see "Second case" in the cover letter). > I mean the code is the easy part here, but I would like > to have an agreed approach for handling all kinds of non-probable > busses. I really don't want an island solution for I2C. So, the key > question here is what do DT maintainers think? > > You sent code without bindings, but I'd think the other way around would > be better for the discussion. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240510163625.GA336987-robh@xxxxxxxxxx/ Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
