On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:49:47PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: (...) > > > +ARM/CIX SKY ARM ARCHITECTURE > > > +M: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > +M: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > +R: CIX Linux Kernel Upstream Group <cix-kernel-upstream@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > +L: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (moderated for non-subscribers) > > > +S: Maintained > > > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml > > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1-orion-o6.dts > > > +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky1.dtsi > > > > Instead: > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/ > > > > or if you think there will be more different architectures coming from > > cix, which you will not maintain, then useful would be a "sky" subdirectory. > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Thanks for your comment, CIX is Arm SoC based silicon design > company, we may have different SoC style for middle end in future. > So, for that SoC series, it may not name sky. I believe the idea is that the file should either say +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/ if the two of you intend to be maintainers for everything under cix/. You don't need to list every specific file. Otherwise it should say +F: arch/arm64/boot/dts/cix/sky/ with its own subdirectory if you only intend to be maintaining the sky family. > -- > > Best regards, > Peter
