> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2025 11:17 PM
> To: Encarnacion, Cedric justine <Cedricjustine.Encarnacion@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>;
> Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jean Delvare <jdelvare@xxxxxxxx>;
> Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>; Delphine CC Chiu
> <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
>
> [External]
>
> On 3/18/25 03:03, Encarnacion, Cedric justine wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Guenter Roeck <groeck7@xxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Guenter Roeck
> >> Sent: Friday, February 28, 2025 12:33 AM
> >> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>; Encarnacion, Cedric justine
> >> <Cedricjustine.Encarnacion@xxxxxxxxxx>; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >> <krzk+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jean Delvare
> >> <jdelvare@xxxxxxxx>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>; Delphine CC Chiu
> >> <Delphine_CC_Chiu@xxxxxxxxxx>; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> >> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-hwmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> >> doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: hwmon: pmbus: add lt3074
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> >> index ddb19c9726d6..289767e5d599 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/pmbus.h
> >> @@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ int pmbus_regulator_init_cb(struct regulator_dev
> *rdev,
> >> { \
> >> .name = (_name), \
> >> .of_match = of_match_ptr(_name), \
> >> - .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"), \
> >> .ops = &pmbus_regulator_ops, \
> >> .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
> >> .owner = THIS_MODULE, \
> >>
> >> Maybe someone can check if that works.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Guenter
> >
> > I'd like to follow up on this one. As of this writing, my understanding
> > is that the dt-binding should not expect regulators subnodes for
> > simple devices like this. There is already a similar binding as
> > mentioned in this thread particularly
> > "dt-bindings/regulator/infineon,ir38060". I think a binding without
> > the subnodes should still work with or without the change above.
>
> Interesting. I am not sure if it really works, though. I looked into
> the regulator code, and I don't immediately see the code path it would
> take.
>
> > With this, I'd like to know what the specific next steps are to continue
> > this patch series.
>
> Can you try on hardware using a devicetree file which doesn't have the
> regulators node ? If the current code works, just submit an updated
> (simplified) .yaml file and we should be good. If not, I have an
> untested patch series introducing another macro which doesn't set
> the regulators node.
Okay. I'll test this and get back to you.
Best Regards,
Cedric
