On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Benson Leung <bleung@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Andrew Bresticker > <abrestic@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> + - compatible: For Tegra124, must contain "nvidia,tegra124-xusb-mbox". >> + Otherwise, must contain '"nvidia,<chip>-xusb-mbox", >> + "nvidia,tegra124-xusb-mbox"' where <chip> is tegra132. > > The driver doesn't seem to have any particular entry for tegra132, so > that would be a bad example. The convention on Tegra is to use "nvidia,<chip>-<ip>" for each IP block. Additionally, since the XUSB-related blocks on Tegra132 are identical to Tegra124, these devices on Tegra132 are 'compatible' with their Tegra124 variants. For some context, see Paul's comments in commit 193c9d23 ("Documentation: DT bindings: add more Tegra chip compatible strings"). Thanks, Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html