On 18/03/2025 06:52, Vikram Sharma wrote: > > On 2/23/2025 5:03 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 03:17:46PM +0530, Vikram Sharma wrote: >>> +properties: >>> + compatible: >>> + const: qcom,qcs8300-camss >>> + >>> + reg: >>> + maxItems: 21 >>> + >>> + reg-names: >>> + items: >>> + - const: csid_wrapper >> Why different order of entries than sm8550? > > Hi Krzysztof, > > Thanks for your review. > I did this change to address a comment from Bryan on another series. > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/e152ff78-caa5-493a-88da-96a6670eb2a2@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > Please suggest if I should keep the order same as sm8550? If you chosen the same order as x1e80100 then it is fine, but that file is not merged so it is your responsibility to track any differences and be sure whatever you send is always in sync with x1e. Best regards, Krzysztof
