From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx> On Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:20:34 +0100, Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The BCM59056 PMU has its own separate DTSI, meant to be included > in a DTS file after defining the pmu node on some I2C bus. > > This seems rather unintuitive; drop the DTS in favor of adding the > BCM59056 PMU node directly into the device DTS files. > > If the amount of subdevices supported by the BCM590xx grows, and > a common device tree turns out to be beneficial, it can be reintroduced > in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Applied to https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/commits/devicetree/next, thanks! -- Florian
