On Fri, 08 May 2015, Peter Griffin wrote: > On Fri, 08 May 2015, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > -- compatible : Must be one of: "st,stih407-lpc" "st,stih416-lpc" > > > > > > - "st,stih415-lpc" "st,stid127-lpc" > > > > > > +- compatible : Must be one of: "st,stih407-lpc" > > > > > > > > > > The same comment as the RTC DT patch, you are removing the compatibles > > > > > documentation for the other supported platforms like stih416-lpc. > > > > > AFAIK they are required in the driver to get the correct sysconfig register. > > > > > > > > That's intentional. I haven't yet tested any of this IP on > > > > STiH41{5,6} & STiH127. Due to lack of documentation, I'm not even > > > > sure if this IP even exists on some of the other platforms. I will > > > > add them back when support is added to both driver and DTB and I've > > > > been able to test them. > > > > > > That was kind of my point, the driver code AFAIK already contains support > > > for these SoC's. > > > > > > I would either expect the patch to remove support from the DT docs AND the > > > driver, or leave it as is. > > > > > > It seems odd to only change the DT docs, and become unaligned to the > > > code (this assumes I'm looking at the latest patchset here > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/4/1088 which includes support for these SoCs). > > > > The decision to remove these 'supported' platforms was made on the RTC > > side, where there is only support for "st,stih407-lpc" in the driver. > > The change makes sense in the RTC case then. > > > I thought it best to mirror that thought over to the Watchdog LPC > > bindings, > > Why? This is the bit I disagree with, the wdt DT docs IMHO should match the wdt > driver code. Fair enough. I'll add the 'supported' compatibles back in. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html