Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add pwm nodes for RK3528

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2025-03-13 08:10, Chukun Pan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> so yes of course the pinctrl needs to be default - simply because
>> that's the only pinctrl state mainline supports.
> 
>> But judging by the fact that you're discussing working vs. non-working
>> below, can you please check if we should drop the patch for 6.15 till
>> that is solved?
> 
> I suggest dropping this patch first, I will send v2
> when this issue is solved.

I noticed that the pwm nodes and saradc node ended up in wrong mmio
address order, so yes please drop the patch (or reorder nodes) ;-)

Chukun, please get back with more details about the issue you are having.
E.g. a stack trace, what board, DT and U-Boot you are using etc.

I have not seen any issue with PWM using the merged patch having
pinctrl-names=default.

Please see my Linux tree [1] and U-Boot tree [2], those are little ahead
of what has been posted on ML, e.g. it has working USB2.0 host, CPU opp,
Hantro VPU, GPU + opp, arm and logic pwm regulators for E20C, ROCK 2A/2F
and Sige1.

Will try to post USB2.0 host and Hantro VPU patches later today.
CPU opp and GPU + opp depend on PWM and I was planning to post that
together with initial thermal support.

[1] https://github.com/Kwiboo/linux-rockchip/commits/next-20250311-rk3528/
[2] https://source.denx.de/u-boot/contributors/kwiboo/u-boot/-/commits/rk3528

Regards,
Jonas

> 
> Thanks,
> Chukun
> 
> --
> 2.25.1
> 





[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux