On 3/11/2025 11:41 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 11/03/2025 17:55, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote: >> >> I kindly ask to elaborate here. >> >> This series does not touch CAMCC at all, and if the series touches CAMCC, >> then it changes DT ABI, which is objected. Or is it for some reason >> objected only for SM8550 and not for the other platforms? More information >> is needed. > > No but it _should_ Vlad, that's the ask. > > Both of these clock controllers will require this same change to be implemented, that's what I'm asking Jagadeesh to do. > > Certainly that's the case for x1e and asking Jagadeesh to also check that for sm8650. > Yes, similar changes are required for camcc on SM8450, SM8550, SM8650 and X1E80100. I will add them in the v3 series. For X1E80100 camcc, I see changes are already raised in dt-bindings[1] and DT[2] to add multi PD support, so I will just include the camcc driver change in v3 for X1E80100. [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250304143152.1799966-1-vladimir.zapolskiy@xxxxxxxxxx/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250119-b4-linux-next-24-11-18-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v4-2-c2964504131c@xxxxxxxxxx/ Thanks, Jagadeesh > --- > bod
