On 05/03/2025 22:09, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote: > Hi Lee, > > > On 2/11/25 9:02 AM, Lee Jones wrote: >> On Thu, 06 Feb 2025 11:37:20 -0600, Shree Ramamoorthy wrote: >>> TPS65214 and TPS65215 are Power Management Integrated Circuits (PMICs) that >>> have significant register map overlap with TPS65219 and each other. The >>> series introduces the 2 new PMICs and restructures the existing driver to >>> support multiple devices. >>> >>> - TPS65214, TPS65215, and TPS65219 each have 3 Buck regulators >>> - TPS65214 has 2 LDOS and 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219 has 4 LDOs and 2 GPOs. >>> - TPS65214's LDO1 maps to TPS65219's LDO3. >>> - A key difference between TPS65215 & TPS65214 are the LDO current and >>> voltage output ranges and the configurable options available. >>> - TPS65215 has 2 LDOs, whereas TPS65219 has 4 LDOs. >>> - TPS65215's LDO2 maps to TPS65219's LDO3. >>> - TPS65215 has 1 GPO, whereas TPS65219 has 2 GPOs. >>> >>> [...] >> Applied, thanks! >> >> [1/5] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65215 PMIC bindings >> commit: 85e7aef57a9e057545017d55b02073e3c4756b2c >> [2/5] regulator: dt-bindings: Add TI TPS65214 PMIC bindings >> commit: 34beb3c87cbb8747f521db5cf1b2a608833f3967 >> [3/5] mfd: tps65219: Remove regmap_read check >> commit: 5342c8a9e04fc05f485a3886605b803a5180bd64 >> [4/5] mfd: tps65219: Add support for TI TPS65215 PMIC >> commit: ebcbd21550853b16f307d7da8c846b862e138a98 >> [5/5] mfd: tps65219: Add support for TI TPS65214 PMIC >> commit: c9878d8d9ac2ecfadfa4fa3543730026c66ad843 >> >> -- >> Lee Jones [李琼斯] > > Would you be able to remove this series from your branch & replace it with this v6 [0], > so Mark Brown will be able to apply the dependent regulator series [1]? Thank you! You replied 3 weeks later. If something was applied not as it should, you ought to reply IMMEDIATELY, not 3 weeks after. The trees are mostly immutable after publishing. Best regards, Krzysztof
