On 3/4/2025 10:16 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 4.03.2025 10:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
<quic_srichara@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
+ ret = msg.resp.status;
return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
ok, yes error.
The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
status != 0 is an error always.
Is it an _errno_ ?
Dmitry's asking whether the status conforms to the Linux's errno.h
ABI. If not, add something like:
ret = msg.resp.status ? -EINVAL : 0
Yeah, responded on other thread. It does not, so will add the mapping.
Regards,
Sricharan
