On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 12:55 PM Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > The naming convention here is a bit confusing, can't we have the > > naming of variables reflect the compatibles they refer to? > > > Emm... > > I named them that way to be consistent with the previous naming. > Of course, we could name them something like > “ls7a2000_acpi_gpio_data”, which might be better understood. > Also, do we need to rename all instances of “loongson_gpio_chip_data”? > Ah, nevermind then. I will apply it as is but yeah, we could consider something better in the future. Bart