Re: [PATCH V4 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 5 May 2015 at 22:42, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This still doesn't say what the value is supposed to mean which means
> it's not possible for someone to write generic code which handles the
> binding - saying that people can reference the value doesn't tell them
> how to interpret it.  A limit?  A nominal constant draw value?  A value
> to regulate to?  Those are all different things expressed as a current.

@Stephen: Can you please answer these queries please, so that we
can get the bindings correctly ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux