On 2/27/25 17:51, Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support for SAMA7D65 new compatible strings in pm.c file for wakeup source
IDs and PMC.
This is the first bits of PM for this new SoC. PM depends on other patches.
Signed-off-by: Ryan Wanner <Ryan.Wanner@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: split patch and address only the pm.c changes]
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
index 6c3e6aa22606..39644703244d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
@@ -222,13 +222,16 @@ static const struct of_device_id sam9x60_ws_ids[] = {
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
-static const struct of_device_id sama7g5_ws_ids[] = {
+static const struct of_device_id sama7_ws_ids[] = {
+ { .compatible = "microchip,sama7d65-rtc", .data = &ws_info[1] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-rtc", .data = &ws_info[1] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-ohci", .data = &ws_info[2] },
{ .compatible = "usb-ohci", .data = &ws_info[2] },
{ .compatible = "atmel,at91sam9g45-ehci", .data = &ws_info[2] },
{ .compatible = "usb-ehci", .data = &ws_info[2] },
+ { .compatible = "microchip,sama7d65-sdhci", .data = &ws_info[3] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-sdhci", .data = &ws_info[3] },
+ { .compatible = "microchip,sama7d65-rtt", .data = &ws_info[4] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-rtt", .data = &ws_info[4] },
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
@@ -1379,6 +1382,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id atmel_pmc_ids[] __initconst = {
{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d2-pmc", .data = &pmc_infos[1] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sam9x60-pmc", .data = &pmc_infos[4] },
{ .compatible = "microchip,sam9x7-pmc", .data = &pmc_infos[4] },
+ { .compatible = "microchip,sama7d65-pmc", .data = &pmc_infos[4] },
According to the chapter 42.18.3. PMC System Clock Status Register at [1] there
is no AT91SAM926x_PMC_UDP for SAMA7D65 (which you are dropping in the next
patch). This patch would have to reflect what the documentation say instead of
fixing it in patch 12/21.
Thank you,
Claudiu
[1]
https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/MPU32/ProductDocuments/DataSheets/SAMA7D6-Series-Data-Sheet-DS60001851.pdf
{ .compatible = "microchip,sama7g5-pmc", .data = &pmc_infos[5] },
{ /* sentinel */ },
};
@@ -1672,7 +1676,7 @@ void __init sama7_pm_init(void)
at91_pm_modes_init(iomaps, ARRAY_SIZE(iomaps));
at91_pm_init(NULL);
- soc_pm.ws_ids = sama7g5_ws_ids;
+ soc_pm.ws_ids = sama7_ws_ids;
soc_pm.config_pmc_ws = at91_sam9x60_config_pmc_ws;
soc_pm.sfrbu_regs.pswbu.key = (0x4BD20C << 8);