On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 08:41:39PM +0000, Lad, Prabhakar wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > + clock-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: stmmaceth > > > + - const: pclk > > > + - const: ptp_ref > > > + - const: tx > > > + - const: rx > > > + - const: tx-180 > > > + - const: rx-180 > > > > As Russell said in an older thread, tx and tx-180 are effectively the > > same clock, but with an inverter added. You should be able to arrange > > the clock tree that if you enable tx, it also enables tx-180 as a > > parent/sibling relationship. > > > I can certainly do that, but not sure in the DT we will be describing > the HW correctly then. I'll have to hide *-180 clocks In the DT and > handle and turning on/off these clocks in the clock driver. ... > clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbd>, > <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbc>, > <&cpg CPG_CORE R9A09G057_GBETH_0_CLK_PTP_REF_I>, > <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb8>, > <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xb9>, > <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xba>, > <&cpg CPG_MOD 0xbb>; Your SoC designer really implemented the 0° and 180° as two separate independently controllable clocks? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
