On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:33:10PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote: > On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 06:18:08PM +0000, Prabhakar wrote: > > + gbeth->dev = dev; > > + gbeth->regs = stmmac_res.addr; > > + plat_dat->bsp_priv = gbeth; > > + plat_dat->set_clk_tx_rate = stmmac_set_clk_tx_rate; > > Thanks for using that! > > > + plat_dat->flags |= STMMAC_FLAG_HWTSTAMP_CORRECT_LATENCY | > > + STMMAC_FLAG_EN_TX_LPI_CLOCKGATING | > > I would like to know what value tx_clk_stop is in > stmmac_mac_enable_tx_lpi() for your setup. Ideally, stmmac should > use the capability report from the PHY to decide whether the > transmit clock can be gated, but sadly we haven't had any support > in phylib/phylink for that until recently, and I haven't modified > stmmac to allow use of that. However, it would be good to gain > knowledge in this area. > > > + STMMAC_FLAG_RX_CLK_RUNS_IN_LPI | > > What is the reason for setting this flag? If it's because of suspend/ > resume failures, does my "net: stmmac: fix resume failures due to > RX clock" series solve this for you without requiring this flag? https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z8B4tVd4nLUKXdQ4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!