Hi Fabrizio, On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 15:55, Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: 28 February 2025 10:17 > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: dma: rz-dmac: Document RZ/V2H(P) family of SoCs > > > > Hi Fabrizio, > > > > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 at 19:16, Fabrizio Castro > > <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: 24 February 2025 12:44 > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: dma: rz-dmac: Document RZ/V2H(P) family of SoCs > > > > > > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 at 16:01, Fabrizio Castro > > > > <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Document the Renesas RZ/V2H(P) family of SoCs DMAC block. > > > > > The Renesas RZ/V2H(P) DMAC is very similar to the one found on the > > > > > Renesas RZ/G2L family of SoCs, but there are some differences: > > > > > * It only uses one register area > > > > > * It only uses one clock > > > > > * It only uses one reset > > > > > * Instead of using MID/IRD it uses REQ NO/ACK NO > > > > > * It is connected to the Interrupt Control Unit (ICU) > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > > v1->v2: > > > > > * Removed RZ/V2H DMAC example. > > > > > * Improved the readability of the `if` statement. > > > > > > > > Thanks for the update! > > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,rz-dmac.yaml > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/renesas,rz-dmac.yaml > > > > > @@ -61,14 +66,22 @@ properties: > > > > > '#dma-cells': > > > > > const: 1 > > > > > description: > > > > > - The cell specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the DMAC port > > > > > - connected to the DMA client and the slave channel configuration > > > > > - parameters. > > > > > + For the RZ/A1H, RZ/Five, RZ/G2{L,LC,UL}, RZ/V2L, and RZ/G3S SoCs, the cell > > > > > + specifies the encoded MID/RID values of the DMAC port connected to the > > > > > + DMA client and the slave channel configuration parameters. > > > > > bits[0:9] - Specifies MID/RID value > > > > > bit[10] - Specifies DMA request high enable (HIEN) > > > > > bit[11] - Specifies DMA request detection type (LVL) > > > > > bits[12:14] - Specifies DMAACK output mode (AM) > > > > > bit[15] - Specifies Transfer Mode (TM) > > > > > + For the RZ/V2H(P) SoC the cell specifies the REQ NO, the ACK NO, and the > > > > > + slave channel configuration parameters. > > > > > + bits[0:9] - Specifies the REQ NO > > > > > > > > So REQ_NO is the new name for MID/RID. > > > > These are documented in Table 4.7-22 ("DMA Transfer Request Detection > > Operation Setting Table"). > > REQ_NO is documented in both Table 4.7-22 and in Table 4.6-23 (column `DMAC No.`). Indeed. But not for all of them. E.g. RSPI is missing, IIC is present. And the numbers are shown in decimal instead of in hex ;-) > > > It's certainly similar. I would say that REQ_NO + ACK_NO is the new MID_RID. > > > > > > > > + bits[10:16] - Specifies the ACK NO > > > > > > > > This is a new field. > > > > However, it is not clear to me which value to specify here, and if this > > > > is a hardware property at all, and thus needs to be specified in DT? > > > > > > It is a HW property. The value to set can be found in Table 4.6-27 from > > > the HW User Manual, column "Ack No". > > > > Thanks, but that table only shows values for SPDIF, SCU, SSIU and PFC > > (for external DMA requests). The most familiar DMA clients listed > > in Table 4.7-22 are missing. E.g. RSPI0 uses REQ_NO 0x8C/0x8D, but > > which values does it need for ACK_NO? > > Only a handful of devices need it. For every other device (and use case) only the > default value is needed. The default value is RZV2H_ICU_DMAC_ACK_NO_DEFAULT = 0x7f? Which I believe already causes you to run into the out-of-range DMACKSELk register offset in rzv2h_icu_register_dma_req_ack()? > But I'll take this out for now, until we get to support a device that actually > needs ACK NO. OK. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds