On 2025/2/27 05:30, Rob Herring wrote: > Every time this code is touched, it breaks. This is not even the only > breakage right now[1]. > >> 2) IMO, the spec may be right. >> The type of size is enough to express any alignment wanted. >> For several kernel allocators. type of 'alignment' should be the type >> of 'size', NOT the type of 'address' > As I said previously, it can be argued either way. > > Rob > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250226115044.zw44p5dxlhy5eoni@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ this issue may be a downstream issue as well. based on comments. they expects the CMA area is within 4G range. but the wrong alloc-ranges config make the range (0x42000000 + 0xc0000000) > 4G across 4G boundary.
