Getting / Setting the frame interval using the V4L2 subdev pad ops get_frame_interval/set_frame_interval causes a deadlock, as the subdev state is locked in the [1] but also in the driver itself. In [2] it's described that the caller is responsible to acquire and release the lock in this case. Therefore, acquiring the lock in the driver is wrong. Remove the lock acquisitions/releases from mt9m114_ifp_get_frame_interval() and mt9m114_ifp_set_frame_interval(). [1] drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c - line 1129 [2] Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-subdev.rst Signed-off-by: Mathis Foerst <mathis.foerst@xxxxxx> --- drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c | 8 -------- 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c index 5c0a8a940fd2..f96f6c010e1b 100644 --- a/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/mt9m114.c @@ -1644,13 +1644,9 @@ static int mt9m114_ifp_get_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, if (interval->which != V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(sensor->ifp.hdl.lock); - ival->numerator = 1; ival->denominator = sensor->ifp.frame_rate; - mutex_unlock(sensor->ifp.hdl.lock); - return 0; } @@ -1669,8 +1665,6 @@ static int mt9m114_ifp_set_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, if (interval->which != V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(sensor->ifp.hdl.lock); - if (ival->numerator != 0 && ival->denominator != 0) sensor->ifp.frame_rate = min_t(unsigned int, ival->denominator / ival->numerator, @@ -1684,8 +1678,6 @@ static int mt9m114_ifp_set_frame_interval(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, if (sensor->streaming) ret = mt9m114_set_frame_rate(sensor); - mutex_unlock(sensor->ifp.hdl.lock); - return ret; } -- 2.34.1
