On 26/02/2025 09:09, Peter Chen wrote: > On 25-02-26 08:02:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL >> >> On 26/02/2025 02:21, Peter Chen wrote: >>> Add device tree bindings for CIX P1 (Internal name sky1) Arm SoC, >>> it consists several SoC models like CP8180, CD8180, etc. >>> >>> Acked-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> <form letter> >> This is a friendly reminder during the review process. >> >> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it. >> >> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation: >> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions >> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed >> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is >> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing >> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost >> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for >> tags received on the version they apply. >> >> Please read: >> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577 >> >> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. >> </form letter> >> > > I have checked the review-process again at: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=935897 This does not matter - that's not a patchwork anyone uses... > It seems no one gives any Reviewed-by or Acked-by Tag. You were directly addressed! So you got email and what did you do with it? And lists received it: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac6c4a8b-a6bd-44a9-993b-3b743a172dcc@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > If I am missing something, please correct me. > Best regards, Krzysztof
