On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:23:36AM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:
>
> On 2025/2/24 18:12, Longbin Li wrote:
> > Add SPI NOR device node for Sophgo.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Longbin Li <looong.bin@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts | 18 ++++++++++++++
> > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044.dtsi | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
> > index c50e61a50013..9c634920f37e 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts
> > @@ -80,6 +80,24 @@ &sd {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&spifmc0 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + flash@0 {
> > + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&spifmc1 {
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + flash@0 {
> > + compatible = "jedec,spi-nor";
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > &uart1 {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
>
> What is your baseline? I can't see "sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10.dts " on the latest
> mainline yet.
>
It seems like he forgot to remove this patch as the baseline is not
submitted.
> BTW, the name "sg2044-sophgo-sd3-10" seems a bit redundant. Wouldn't
> "sg2044-sd3-10" be better?
>
I do not think so. we want <soc-vendor-board> format. In this format.
sophgo is a must.
Regards,
Inochi
