On 24/02/2025 18:47, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote: >> >> I wonder why do we need to keep growing this list? All devices are >> compatible, aren't they? > > Well, there are two variants of compatibility having different mask > values. > >> Do you use clkout, BTW? > > Using the clocks defined by clkout? No. I added it as downstream > had it too. And the devices work fine without it. If you want me > to remove this patch and send the PMU patch to its respective > series I'll do that then (unless you object or suggest something > else). clkout is a testing tool and I doubt you can use it on a phone - finding the actual clkout pins to connect the oscilloscope is tricky. If this is about to grow and be used, then we should fix the compatibility and do not duplicate the ID table. Best regards, Krzysztof
