Hi Steve,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 1:26 PM, S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Add MFD support for the DA9063 OnKey driver
Thanks for your patch!
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9063-core.c
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ static struct resource da9063_rtc_resources[] = {
>
> static struct resource da9063_onkey_resources[] = {
> {
> + .name = "ONKEY",
> .start = DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY,
> .end = DA9063_IRQ_ONKEY,
> .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell da9063_devs[] = {
> .name = DA9063_DRVNAME_ONKEY,
> .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(da9063_onkey_resources),
> .resources = da9063_onkey_resources,
> + .of_compatible = "dlg,da9063-onkey",
> },
> {
> .name = DA9063_DRVNAME_RTC,
> @@ -109,12 +111,64 @@ static const struct mfd_cell da9063_devs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +static int da9063_clear_fault_log(struct da9063 *da9063)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + int fault_log = 0;
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(da9063->regmap, DA9063_REG_FAULT_LOG, &fault_log);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot read FAULT_LOG.\n");
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> +
> + if (fault_log) {
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_TWD_ERROR)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_TWD_ERROR\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_POR)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_POR\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_VDD_FAULT)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_VDD_FAULT\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_VDD_START)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_VDD_START\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_TEMP_CRIT)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_TEMP_CRIT\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_KEY_RESET)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_KEY_RESET\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_NSHUTDOWN)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_NSHUTDOWN\n");
> + if (fault_log & DA9063_WAIT_SHUT)
> + dev_dbg(da9063->dev,
> + "Fault log entry detected: DA9063_WAIT_SHUT\n");
> + }
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(da9063->regmap,
> + DA9063_REG_FAULT_LOG,
> + fault_log);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(da9063->dev,
> + "Cannot reset FAULT_LOG values %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> int da9063_device_init(struct da9063 *da9063, unsigned int irq)
> {
> struct da9063_pdata *pdata = da9063->dev->platform_data;
> int model, variant_id, variant_code;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = da9063_clear_fault_log(da9063);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(da9063->dev, "Cannot clear fault log\n");
> +
> if (pdata) {
> da9063->flags = pdata->flags;
> da9063->irq_base = pdata->irq_base;
The code above doesn't seem to match the patch description.
Can you please explain why it is needed?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
