On 20.02.2025 11:50 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 12:53:10PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 08:56:16PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> Enable PCIe endpoint support for the Qualcomm SAR2130P platform.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> index c08f64d7a825fa5da22976c8020f96ee5faa5462..dec5675c7c9d52b77f084ae139845b488fa02d2c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
>>> @@ -933,6 +933,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_ep_match[] = {
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sa8775p-pcie-ep", .data = &cfg_1_34_0},
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sdx55-pcie-ep", },
>>> { .compatible = "qcom,sm8450-pcie-ep", },
>>> + { .compatible = "qcom,sar2130p-pcie-ep", },
>>
>> Could you please use a fallback? I'd prefer to not add compatible to the driver
>> unless it requires special config.
>
> This is a tough question, I have been thinking about it too. But granted
> the differences in clocks used by the controller I opted to use
> different compat strings without a fallback. I think it would be hard to
> describe the schema otherwise.
You could use if-else ordering or is: instead of contains: but I don't mind
Konrad
