Re: [PATCH v4 19/21] drivers/of: Support adding sub-tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 07:54 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

> The difference seems to be whether you allocate space or just point to
> the FDT for various strings/data. Is that right?
> 
> >    * of_fdt_add_subtree() is the introduced API to do the work.
> 
> Have you looked at overlays and if so why do they not work for your purposes?
> 
> Why do you need to do this with the flattened tree?

The basic idea I asked Gavin to implement is that since the FW needs to
provide a bunch of DT updates to Linux at runtime in the form of new
nodes below an existing one, rather than doing it via some new/custom
format, instead, have it send a bit of FDT blob to expand under an
existing node.

As for the details of Gavin implementation, I haven't looked at it in
details yet so there might be issues there, however I don't know what
you mean by "overlays", any pointer ?

Cheers,
Ben.




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux