Hi Eddie,
I have some minor comments inline:
On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 15:27 -0600, Eddie James wrote:
> The Balcones system is similar to Bonnell but with a POWER11 processor.
Can you add some commentary about the P11 dual vs quad changes here?
>
> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile | 1 +
> .../dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts | 594 +++++++++++++
> .../arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi | 779 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-quad.dtsi | 769 +----------------
> 4 files changed, 1376 insertions(+), 767 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile
> index 2e5f4833a073b..71b2d67fdbac8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/Makefile
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ASPEED) += \
> aspeed-bmc-facebook-yamp.dtb \
> aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemitev2.dtb \
> aspeed-bmc-facebook-yosemite4.dtb \
> + aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dtb \
> aspeed-bmc-ibm-blueridge.dtb \
> aspeed-bmc-ibm-bonnell.dtb \
> aspeed-bmc-ibm-everest.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..0fe99a748b63b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/aspeed-bmc-ibm-balcones.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,594 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +// Copyright 2025 IBM Corp.
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/gpio/aspeed-gpio.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/i2c/i2c.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/leds/leds-pca955x.h>
> +#include "aspeed-g6.dtsi"
> +#include "ibm-power11-dual.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Balcones";
> + compatible = "ibm,balcones-bmc", "aspeed,ast2600";
> +
>
...
> +};
> +
> +&i2c0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + eeprom@51 {
> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
> + reg = <0x51>;
> + };
> +
> + gpio@20 {
Can you please follow the DTS coding style and order the nodes by unit
address?
https://docs.kernel.org/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.html#order-of-nodes
Ordering the top-level label references alphabetically would be
appreciated too. It doesn't seem like they're in an order reflecting
e.g. the unit address, it feels kind of arbitrary.
> + compatible = "ti,tca9554";
> + reg = <0x20>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> +
> + gpio-line-names =
> + "",
> + "RUSSEL_FW_I2C_ENABLE_N",
> + "RUSSEL_OPPANEL_PRESENCE_N",
> + "BLYTH_OPPANEL_PRESENCE_N",
> + "CPU_TPM_CARD_PRESENT_N",
> + "",
> + "",
> + "DASD_BP_PRESENT_N";
> + };
> +};
> +
...
> +
> +&i2c5 {
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + eeprom@52 {
> + compatible = "atmel,24c64";
> + reg = <0x52>;
> + };
> +
> + temperature-sensor@4e {
Ordering again here.
> + compatible = "ti,tmp435";
> + reg = <0x4e>;
> + };
> +};
>
...
> +
> +&kcs3 {
> + status = "okay";
> + aspeed,lpc-io-reg = <0xca2>;
> + aspeed,lpc-interrupts = <11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..e5f65258e082f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed/ibm-power11-dual.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,779 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> +// Copyright 2025 IBM Corp.
> +
> +/ {
>
...
> +
> +&fsim0 {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + status = "okay";
> + bus-frequency = <100000000>;
> + cfam-reset-gpios = <&gpio0 ASPEED_GPIO(Q, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +
> + cfam@0,0 {
> + reg = <0 0>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + chip-id = <0>;
> +
> +
...
> +
> + sbefifo@2400 {
> + compatible = "ibm,p9-sbefifo";
> + reg = <0x2400 0x400>;
> +
> + occ {
> + compatible = "ibm,p10-occ";
I assume this doesn't need a new compatible for P11 (given you're
moving it out of the quad DTSI).
Andrew
