Hi Quentin,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 12:12:24PM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> On 2/19/25 11:33 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 11:08:43AM +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> > > On 2/18/25 5:56 PM, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > > Add support to configure the PWM-Out pin polarity based on a device
> > > > tree property.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/hwmon/amc6821.c | 7 +++++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/amc6821.c b/drivers/hwmon/amc6821.c
> > > > index 1e3c6acd8974..1ea2d97eebca 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/amc6821.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/amc6821.c
> > > > @@ -845,7 +845,7 @@ static int amc6821_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info
> > > > return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > -static int amc6821_init_client(struct amc6821_data *data)
> > > > +static int amc6821_init_client(struct i2c_client *client, struct amc6821_data *data)
> > > > {
> > > > struct regmap *regmap = data->regmap;
> > > > int err;
> > > > @@ -864,6 +864,9 @@ static int amc6821_init_client(struct amc6821_data *data)
> > > > if (err)
> > > > return err;
> > > > + if (of_property_read_bool(client->dev.of_node, "ti,pwm-inverted"))
> > >
> > > I know that the AMC6821 is doing a lot of smart things, but this really
> > > tickled me. PWM controllers actually do support that already via
> > > PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED flag for example. See
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/adt7475.yaml which seems to be
> > > another HWMON driver which acts as a PWM controller. I'm not sure this is
> > > relevant, applicable or desired but I wanted to highlight this.
> >
> > From the DT binding point of view, it seems to implement the same I am
> > proposing here with adi,pwm-active-state property.
> >
>
> Ah! It seems like I read only the part that agreed with the idea I had in
> mind :)
>
> > Do you have anything more specific in mind?
> >
>
> Yes, #pwm-cells just below in the binding. You can then see that the third
> cell in a PWM specifier is for the polarity. If I didn't misread once more,
> I believe that what's in adi,pwm-active-state is ignored based on the
> content of the PWM flags in a PWM cell specifier, c.f.
> adt7475_set_pwm_polarity followed by adt7475_fan_pwm_config in
> adt7475_probe. I would have assumed that having the polarity inverted in
> adi,pwm-active-state would mean that the meaning of the flag in the PWM cell
> specifier would be inverted as well, meaning 0 -> inverted,
> PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED -> doubly inverted so "normal" polarity.
>
> adt7475_fan_pwm_config was added a few years after adt7475_set_pwm_polarity.
I think this is out of scope for this patch. The amc6821 can control the
fan PWM stand-alone, this change has nothing to do with the generic pwm
framework, this is required to have the PWM out pin correctly driven by
the fan controller chip.
> Module params over DT is fine with me, I just want consistency here, so if
> it's always the case, fine :)
Ok, I'll implement it this way.
Francesco
