Hi,
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 13:07:51 +0530
> parvathi <parvathi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> From: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>>
>> Changes corresponding to link configuration such as speed and duplexity.
>> IRQ and handler initializations are performed for packet reception.Firmware
>> receives the packet from the wire and stores it into OCMC queue. Next, it
>> notifies the CPU via interrupt. Upon receiving the interrupt CPU will
>> service the IRQ and packet will be processed by pushing the newly allocated
>> SKB to upper layers.
>>
>> When the user application want to transmit a packet, it will invoke
>> sys_send() which will inturn invoke the PRUETH driver, then it will write
>> the packet into OCMC queues. PRU firmware will pick up the packet and
>> transmit it on to the wire.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@xxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Parvathi Pudi <parvathi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>> +/* update phy/port status information for firmware */
>> +static void icssm_emac_update_phystatus(struct prueth_emac *emac)
>> +{
>> + struct prueth *prueth = emac->prueth;
>> + u32 phy_speed, port_status = 0;
>> + enum prueth_mem region;
>> + u32 delay;
>> +
>> + region = emac->dram;
>> + phy_speed = emac->speed;
>> + icssm_prueth_write_reg(prueth, region, PHY_SPEED_OFFSET, phy_speed);
>> +
>> + delay = TX_CLK_DELAY_100M;
>> +
>> + delay = delay << PRUSS_MII_RT_TXCFG_TX_CLK_DELAY_SHIFT;
>> +
>> + if (emac->port_id) {
>> + regmap_update_bits(prueth->mii_rt,
>> + PRUSS_MII_RT_TXCFG1,
>> + PRUSS_MII_RT_TXCFG_TX_CLK_DELAY_MASK,
>> + delay);
>> + } else {
>> + regmap_update_bits(prueth->mii_rt,
>> + PRUSS_MII_RT_TXCFG0,
>> + PRUSS_MII_RT_TXCFG_TX_CLK_DELAY_MASK,
>> + delay);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (emac->link)
>> + port_status |= PORT_LINK_MASK;
>> +
>> + writeb(port_status, prueth->mem[region].va + PORT_STATUS_OFFSET);
>> +}
>> +
>> /* called back by PHY layer if there is change in link state of hw port*/
>> static void icssm_emac_adjust_link(struct net_device *ndev)
>> {
>> @@ -369,6 +426,8 @@ static void icssm_emac_adjust_link(struct net_device *ndev)
>> emac->link = 0;
>> }
>>
>> + icssm_emac_update_phystatus(emac);
>> +
>
> It looks to me like emac->link, emac->speed and emac->duplex are only
> used in icssm_emac_update_phystatus(). If you consider either passing
> these as parameters to the above function, or simply merge
> icssm_emac_update_phystatus() into your adjust_link callback, you can get
> rid of these 3 attributes entirely. It even looks like emac->duplex is
> simply unused.
>
Sure, we will address this in the next version.
Thanks and Regards,
Parvathi.
