Re: [PATCH v7 2/7] dt-bindings: intel: document Agilex PCIe Root Port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17/02/2025 16:47, matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sun, 16 Feb 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 09:53:54AM -0600, Matthew Gerlach wrote:
>>> The Agilex7f devkit can support PCIe End Points with the appropriate
>>> daughter card.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> v7:
>>>  - New patch to series.
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> index 2ee0c740eb56..0da5810c9510 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
>>>                - intel,n5x-socdk
>>>                - intel,socfpga-agilex-n6000
>>>                - intel,socfpga-agilex-socdk
>>> +              - intel,socfpga-agilex7f-socdk-pcie-root-port
>>
>> Compatible should represent the board, so what is here exactly the
>> board? 7f? Agilex7f? socdk? Or is it standard agilex-socdk but with some
>> things attached?
> 
> The board is the Agilex 7 FPGA F-Series Transceiver-Soc Development Kit:
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/fpga/development-kits/agilex/si-agf014.html

Isn't Agilex7 a SoC? I don't see it in the list of compatibles.

> 
> There is not a single, standard agilex-socdk board. There are currently 
> three variants. In addition to the F-Series socdk, there are I-Series and 
> M-Series devkits:
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/fpga/development-kits/agilex/si-agi027.html
> https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/details/fpga/development-kits/agilex/agm039.html

Pages above show distinctive names for the boards, so I am confused why
they are not used.



Best regards,
Krzysztof




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux