On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 10:16:23AM +0530, Swathi K S wrote: > + clock-names: > + minItems: 5 > + maxItems: 10 > + contains: > + enum: > + - ptp_ref > + - master_bus > + - slave_bus > + - tx > + - rx > + - master2_bus > + - slave2_bus > + - eqos_rxclk_mux > + - eqos_phyrxclk > + - dout_peric_rgmii_clk This does not match the previous entry. It should be strictly ordered with minItems: 5. > + > + iommus: > + maxItems: 1 > + > + phy-mode: > + enum: > + - rgmii-id > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + - interrupts > + - clocks > + - clock-names > + - iommus > + - phy-mode > + > +unevaluatedProperties: false > + > +examples: > + - | > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/fsd-clk.h> > + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> > + soc { > + #address-cells = <2>; > + #size-cells = <2>; > + ethernet1: ethernet@14300000 { > + compatible = "tesla,fsd-ethqos"; > + reg = <0x0 0x14300000 0x0 0x10000>; > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 176 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; > + interrupt-names = "macirq"; > + clocks = <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_TOP_IPCLKPORT_CLK_PTP_REF_I>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_TOP_IPCLKPORT_ACLK_I>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_TOP_IPCLKPORT_HCLK_I>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_TOP_IPCLKPORT_RGMII_CLK_I>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_TOP_IPCLKPORT_CLK_RX_I>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_BUS_D_PERIC_IPCLKPORT_EQOSCLK>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_BUS_P_PERIC_IPCLKPORT_EQOSCLK>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_PHYRXCLK_MUX>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_EQOS_PHYRXCLK>, > + <&clock_peric PERIC_DOUT_RGMII_CLK>; > + clock-names = "ptp_ref", "master_bus", "slave_bus","tx", > + "rx", "master2_bus", "slave2_bus", "eqos_rxclk_mux", > + "eqos_phyrxclk","dout_peric_rgmii_clk"; > + pinctrl-names = "default"; > + pinctrl-0 = <ð1_tx_clk>, <ð1_tx_data>, <ð1_tx_ctrl>, > + <ð1_phy_intr>, <ð1_rx_clk>, <ð1_rx_data>, > + <ð1_rx_ctrl>, <ð1_mdio>; > + iommus = <&smmu_peric 0x0 0x1>; > + phy-mode = "rgmii-id"; > + }; Misaligned/misindented. Best regards, Krzysztof