On Mon, Feb 10, 2025, at 21:05, Caleb Connolly wrote:
> On 2/10/25 18:14, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 8.02.2025 12:49 AM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>>> (resending from not a mobile client, oops)
>>>
>>> On 2/7/25 21:20, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>>> On 7.02.2025 4:17 PM, Caleb Connolly wrote:
>>>>> From: "Dr. Git" <drgitx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rather than manually define the guard pages, use the
>>>>> "qcom,use-guard-pages" property for rmtfs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: "Dr. Git" <drgitx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure this ID is acceptable
>>>
>>>
>>> Linus & Greg explicitly allowed for aliases previously. Patches by "Asahi Lina" and others have been merged.
>>
>> Correct, however the trust is put into the maintainer. Marcan et al. accepted
>> patches by ""Asahi Lina"", as they had enough confidence to put their name
>> behind said contributor not being e.g. on the sanctioned lists.
>
> Right, well please let me know your decision and how you'd like to
> proceed if this patch is unacceptable.
This is clearly a grey area, but since you are familiar with the
patch author, and are have added your S-o-B, I don't mind taking
the patch through the SoC tree with that S-o-B chain, even if I
would not personally apply a patch from the same author without
additional information.
I would suggest that Konrad should follows the same rules
here, but of course they are free to make their own decisions.
Arnd
