Hi Conor! On Tue, 2025-02-11 at 10:50 +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 11:09:40PM +0100, Alexander Sverdlin wrote: > > This series adds very basic support for Milk-V Duo Module 01 EVB [1] in > > arm64 mode. The SoC (SG2000) is dual-arch, RiscV and ARM64, the latter has > > been chosen because the upstream toolchain can be utilized. > > > .../{riscv => soc/sophgo}/sophgo.yaml | 7 +- > > arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 6 ++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile | 2 + > > I'd expect this to be maintained alongside the riscv support, how come > there's no maintainers entry change here? MAINTAINERS file has "K: sophgo" entry already, I suppose new files will fall into this category? That's why I've ignored this specific checkpatch warning in all patches. Am I wrong? > > .../sophgo/sg2000-milkv-duo-module-01-evb.dts | 31 +++++++ > > .../sophgo/sg2000-milkv-duo-module-01.dtsi | 85 +++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2000.dtsi | 75 +++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 5 + > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1800b.dtsi | 64 ++++++++++--- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv1812h.dtsi | 64 ++++++++++--- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv181x.dtsi | 2 +- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx-cpu.dtsi | 57 ++++++++++++ > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx.dtsi | 91 +++++-------------- > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2002.dtsi | 64 ++++++++++--- > > 14 files changed, 451 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-) > > rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{riscv => soc/sophgo}/sophgo.yaml (80%) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/Makefile > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2000-milkv-duo-module-01-evb.dts > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2000-milkv-duo-module-01.dtsi > > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2000.dtsi > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/cv18xx-cpu.dtsi -- Alexander Sverdlin.