On Thu, Feb 06, 2025 at 01:06:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > this series' goal is to soften the special device-tree binding of > marvel,pxa-pwm devices. This is the only binding that doesn't pass the > line index as first parameter. > > Here the #pwm-cells value is bumped from 1 to 3, keeping compatibility > with the old binding. > > The motivation for this was that Hervé sent a patch introducing pwm > nexus nodes which don't work nicely with the marvel,pxa-pwm > particularities. > > Changes since (implicit) v1, available at > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pwm/cover.1738777221.git.u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxx: > > - Use #pwm-cells = <3> also in the binding example (*sigh*), pointed > out by Rob > - Add review, ack and test tags by Hervé Codina, Conor Dooley, Duje > Mihanović and Daniel Mack. Thanks! > > I intend to take the first patch via my pwm tree. Assuming the pxa and > device tree maintainers and bots are happy now: Dear pxa maintainers, > please tell if I should take the whole series via pwm, or if you want to > take patches #2 and #3. If the latter: Do you want to delay application > or should I provide an immutable branch for patch #1? I applied patch #1 to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ukleinek/linux.git pwm/for-next now. I don't know yet what should happen to the two other patches, but maybe it's a good idea to wait a bit anyhow to have 3 cells working for the pxa driver for a kernel release or two before we switch it. Best regards Uwe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
